From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Shawn O. Pearce" Subject: Re: CGit and repository list Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:22:51 -0700 Message-ID: <20080912162251.GM22960@spearce.org> References: <19449377.post@talk.nabble.com> <8c5c35580809120736x4170b2dbq3438bd619326ae00@mail.gmail.com> <20080912145804.GF10544@machine.or.cz> <200809121754.30277.jnareb@gmail.com> <20080912160538.GB10360@machine.or.cz> <20080912160854.GL22960@spearce.org> <20080912162037.GC10360@machine.or.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Jakub Narebski , Lars Hjemli , git@vger.kernel.org To: Petr Baudis X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Sep 12 18:24:06 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KeBRA-0000w1-KW for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:24:01 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753762AbYILQWw (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2008 12:22:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753475AbYILQWw (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2008 12:22:52 -0400 Received: from george.spearce.org ([209.20.77.23]:39817 "EHLO george.spearce.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753112AbYILQWw (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2008 12:22:52 -0400 Received: by george.spearce.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9D2E63835C; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:22:51 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080912162037.GC10360@machine.or.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Petr Baudis wrote: > > > > Disk IO and network IO consumed probably. The kernel.org folks are > > hoping the smart HTTP server can lower their loads a bit by being > > more careful about what we send to the client. > > To check whether it actually matters for me, I have counted HTTP > requests for info/refs: 42 per hour for the last 5.5 days. So it might. > 28% of the requests are web crawlers. > > For objects/../, it is more fun - 1942 requests per hour. 46% is > accounted for web crawlers. I will put up a robots.txt. ;-) Is Googlebot trying to make those loose objects searchable? I wonder what byte sequence I should try in the search bar... ;-) -- Shawn.