From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr Baudis Subject: Re: CGit and repository list Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:13:36 +0200 Message-ID: <20080912191336.GD10360@machine.or.cz> References: <19449377.post@talk.nabble.com> <200809121754.30277.jnareb@gmail.com> <20080912160538.GB10360@machine.or.cz> <200809121940.43471.jnareb@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Sep 12 21:14:52 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KeE6R-0007kn-A5 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:14:47 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755217AbYILTNi convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:13:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755410AbYILTNi (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:13:38 -0400 Received: from w241.dkm.cz ([62.24.88.241]:51349 "EHLO machine.or.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754981AbYILTNi (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:13:38 -0400 Received: by machine.or.cz (Postfix, from userid 2001) id 1AE39393A36E; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:13:36 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200809121940.43471.jnareb@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 07:40:43PM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote: > Dnia pi=B1tek 12. wrze=B6nia 2008 18:05, Petr Baudis napisa=B3: > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 05:54:29PM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote: > >> > >> P.S. Could you please gather some statistics to compare the period > >> before and after installing "smart" HTTP server (and after smart > >> clients became widespread). > >=20 > > What kind of statistics? >=20 > In the simplest case just some averaged system load (perhaps load=20 > average from uptime, or from top, or from /proc) before and after. > Perhaps bandwidth used per week or something like that too. This statistics are already available at http://rover.dkm.cz/~yanek/stats/ > If you have time and interest, CPU load, disk IO, network IO or > network bandwidth used, and average time to serve request (latency) > for fetching via HTTP protocol, for "dumb" and "smart" clients, > perhaps averaged over number of requests. (I don't know unfortunatel= y=20 > how to get such data). >=20 > In short: check how "smart" HTTP protocol would improve things. =2E..and I don't know out of the top of my head how to best gather the rest either. ;-) (If someone is really interested about all this, that'= s fine, but they have to give me a pre-made cookbook of recipes how to hook that up to RRD.) --=20 Petr "Pasky" Baudis The next generation of interesting software will be done on the Macintosh, not the IBM PC. -- Bill Gates