From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [Bug #11548] kernel BUG at drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c:1373! Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 23:21:32 +0200 Message-ID: <200809122321.33257.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <1221252989.8709.11.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1221252989.8709.11.camel-cGoWVVl3WGUrkklhUoBCrlaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Chris Mason Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List On Friday, 12 of September 2008, Chris Mason wrote: > On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 21:06 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > (either way). > > > > This is still a bug, but I haven't tried this workload on 2.6.26, so I'm > not sure it is a regression. Unfortunately, I won't be able to test it > again until after the plumber's conference. That's fine. In case it turns out to be a regression, it's better to list it for now IMO. :-) Thanks, Rafael From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758003AbYILVQu (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:16:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755580AbYILVQm (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:16:42 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:43198 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755410AbYILVQl (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:16:41 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Chris Mason Subject: Re: [Bug #11548] kernel BUG at drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c:1373! Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 23:21:32 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List References: <1221252989.8709.11.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> In-Reply-To: <1221252989.8709.11.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200809122321.33257.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday, 12 of September 2008, Chris Mason wrote: > On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 21:06 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > (either way). > > > > This is still a bug, but I haven't tried this workload on 2.6.26, so I'm > not sure it is a regression. Unfortunately, I won't be able to test it > again until after the plumber's conference. That's fine. In case it turns out to be a regression, it's better to list it for now IMO. :-) Thanks, Rafael