From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754560AbYINN2P (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Sep 2008 09:28:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753865AbYINN16 (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Sep 2008 09:27:58 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:58215 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753287AbYINN16 (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Sep 2008 09:27:58 -0400 Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 15:27:42 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Venkatesh Pallipadi Cc: arjan@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, andi@firstfloor.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suresh Siddha , Frans Pop Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] x86: Handle error returns in set_memory_* Message-ID: <20080914132742.GB554@elte.hu> References: <20080913000003.732756000@linux-os.sc.intel.com> <20080913000051.970641000@linux-os.sc.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080913000051.970641000@linux-os.sc.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.1 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.1 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_05 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.1 BAYES_05 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 1 to 5% [score: 0.0174] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote: > Correctly handle the error returns from set_memory_*. We have to free > memtype on error return path. ah, so this is what caused the display artifacts reported by Frans Pop? Ingo