From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [Bug #11398] hda_intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj. Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 02:13:31 +0200 Message-ID: <200809150213.32780.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200809130937.52685.elendil@planet.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Takashi Iwai Cc: Frans Pop , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List On Saturday, 13 of September 2008, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Sat, 13 Sep 2008 09:37:51 +0200, > Frans Pop wrote: > > > > On Friday 12 September 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me > > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11398 > > > Subject : hda_intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. > > > Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj. > > > > Still there. > > Yeah, the driver wasn't changed about this. > > Basically it's a warning message that CPU usage got higher due to > somehow wrongly behaving hardware. The driver behavior itself didn't > do anything wrong. That is, if the driver didn't show it, you > wouldn't have noticed any change (or noticed improvements in some apps > :) > > Of course, it would be ideal if we can add a perfect workaround for > it, but right now, I have no idea what to do better. So, I don't > think it's worth to keeping this open as a regression. I've closed the bug. Thanks, Rafael From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754966AbYIOAIu (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Sep 2008 20:08:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753625AbYIOAIk (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Sep 2008 20:08:40 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:50946 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750924AbYIOAIk (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Sep 2008 20:08:40 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: [Bug #11398] hda_intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj. Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 02:13:31 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Frans Pop , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List References: <200809130937.52685.elendil@planet.nl> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200809150213.32780.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday, 13 of September 2008, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Sat, 13 Sep 2008 09:37:51 +0200, > Frans Pop wrote: > > > > On Friday 12 September 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me > > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11398 > > > Subject : hda_intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. > > > Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj. > > > > Still there. > > Yeah, the driver wasn't changed about this. > > Basically it's a warning message that CPU usage got higher due to > somehow wrongly behaving hardware. The driver behavior itself didn't > do anything wrong. That is, if the driver didn't show it, you > wouldn't have noticed any change (or noticed improvements in some apps > :) > > Of course, it would be ideal if we can add a perfect workaround for > it, but right now, I have no idea what to do better. So, I don't > think it's worth to keeping this open as a regression. I've closed the bug. Thanks, Rafael