From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754568AbYIOKUB (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Sep 2008 06:20:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752492AbYIOKTw (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Sep 2008 06:19:52 -0400 Received: from mail-gx0-f16.google.com ([209.85.217.16]:37877 "EHLO mail-gx0-f16.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752476AbYIOKTv (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Sep 2008 06:19:51 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=tQUljdfkQsJr+yHjgGJOIjRT5fpW32DgXVOxowH4rRGvGmGuo5gpcXkj/RUya4WN18 FBso2htiDgMUMqSngSiBZwQG1ZWM7dZ3Ogn4Xx+EbFIKO71fxJwbhLbk9VAFJU8Cxuvt 9twfFg39sPIXYihOOpt58EUbSHTJOTFi3nM0A= Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 14:20:07 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Ingo Molnar , "Maciej W. Rozycki" , LKML , Yinghai Lu Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: smpboot - check if we have ESR register in wakeup_secondary_cpu Message-ID: <20080915102007.GB7131@lenovo> References: <20080914175849.GC3907@lenovo> <20080915075655.GC29585@elte.hu> <20080915100119.GA7131@lenovo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080915100119.GA7131@lenovo> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [Cyrill Gorcunov - Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 02:01:19PM +0400] | [Ingo Molnar - Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 09:56:55AM +0200] | | | | * Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: | | | | > We should check if we have ESR register before writting to it. | | > | | > Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov | | > --- | | > | | > Please review! | | > it seems the same nit in do_boot_cpu - checking now. | | > | | > Index: linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | | > =================================================================== | | > --- linux-2.6.git.orig/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c 2008-09-14 19:43:03.000000000 +0400 | | > +++ linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c 2008-09-14 21:49:36.000000000 +0400 | | > @@ -598,10 +598,12 @@ wakeup_secondary_cpu(int logical_apicid, | | > * Give the other CPU some time to accept the IPI. | | > */ | | > udelay(200); | | > - maxlvt = lapic_get_maxlvt(); | | > - if (maxlvt > 3) /* Due to the Pentium erratum 3AP. */ | | > - apic_write(APIC_ESR, 0); | | > - accept_status = (apic_read(APIC_ESR) & 0xEF); | | > + if (APIC_INTEGRATED(apic_version[phys_apicid])) { | | > + maxlvt = lapic_get_maxlvt(); | | > + if (maxlvt > 3) /* Due to the Pentium erratum 3AP. */ | | > + apic_write(APIC_ESR, 0); | | > + accept_status = (apic_read(APIC_ESR) & 0xEF); | | > + } | | > pr_debug("NMI sent.\n"); | | | | hm, is there any non-integrated lapic that has more than 3 lvts? iirc | | lvts were introduced with the integrated lapic. | | | | Ingo | | | | Yes Ingo, but don't forget the next line in former | | accept_status = (apic_read(APIC_ESR) & 0xEF); | | so we're protected in writting but _not_ in reading - which | is buggy a bit :-) | | - Cyrill - Ingo - could you replace in this patch message and subject - writting to reading - it will be more correct. - Cyrill -