From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:23:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20080917.152313.173231111.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1221483926.30816.18.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <20080917125053.1f9ecf37.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <200809171724.36269.paul.moore@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200809171724.36269.paul.moore-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org> Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" To: paul.moore-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org Cc: akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, sds-+05T5uksL2qpZYMLLGbcSA@public.gmane.org, jmorris-gx6/JNMH7DfYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org From: Paul Moore Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:24:36 -0400 > If that is the case I'm not sure it is really that big of a deal. Maybe > I'm in the minority here, but in my mind once you step away from the > distro supplied kernel (also applies to other packages, although those > are arguably less critical) you should also bear the responsibility to > make sure you upgrade/tweak/install whatever other bits need to be > fixed. No, we tend to call this breaking things instead. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756083AbYIQWXh (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:23:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755355AbYIQWX1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:23:27 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:59992 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752987AbYIQWX0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:23:26 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:23:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20080917.152313.173231111.davem@davemloft.net> To: paul.moore@hp.com Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, sds@tycho.nsa.gov, jmorris@namei.org, rjw@sisk.pl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <200809171724.36269.paul.moore@hp.com> References: <1221483926.30816.18.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <20080917125053.1f9ecf37.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <200809171724.36269.paul.moore@hp.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.1 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Paul Moore Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:24:36 -0400 > If that is the case I'm not sure it is really that big of a deal. Maybe > I'm in the minority here, but in my mind once you step away from the > distro supplied kernel (also applies to other packages, although those > are arguably less critical) you should also bear the responsibility to > make sure you upgrade/tweak/install whatever other bits need to be > fixed. No, we tend to call this breaking things instead.