From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Suspend-devel list <suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
"Zhao, Yakui" <yakui.zhao@intel.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
"lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"andi@firstfloor.org" <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: ACPI suspend: test 64-bit waking vector (was Re: [PATCH] ACPI suspend: Always use the 32-bit waking vector)
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 09:28:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080917072858.GA2659@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200809170745.19645.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Wed 2008-09-17 07:45:18, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, 15 of September 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > ACPI specificiation tells us that x_firmware_waking_vector is
> > preffered, and maybe it works better than firmware_waking_vector on
> > some machines.
> >
> > Unfortunately, it does not seem to work on thinkpad x60... but I am
> > not sure if I'm not doing something wrong.
> >
> > Testing/ideas would be welcome.
>
> Well, the spec says that if x_firmware_waking_vector is non-zero, the BIOS is
> supposed to call your wake-up code in Protected Mode ...
That's why I'm passing physical address of 32-bit code...
or am I supposed to pass 48-bit selector:offset pair? But what GDT
will BIOS use in that case?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-17 7:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-04 5:51 [PATCH]: ACPI : Set 32bit and 64bit waking vector in FCAS table Zhao Yakui
2008-09-04 8:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-04 9:18 ` Zhang Rui
2008-09-04 9:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-04 12:07 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-09-05 1:17 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-09-05 1:21 ` Li, Shaohua
2008-09-05 10:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 11:13 ` [PATCH] ACPI suspend: Always use the 32-bit waking vector Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-14 11:46 ` Pavel Machek
2008-09-14 23:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-15 9:50 ` Pavel Machek
2008-09-17 5:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-17 7:29 ` Pavel Machek
2008-09-15 11:18 ` ACPI suspend: test 64-bit waking vector (was Re: [PATCH] ACPI suspend: Always use the 32-bit waking vector) Pavel Machek
2008-09-17 5:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-17 7:28 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2008-09-17 16:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-24 7:17 ` [PATCH] ACPI suspend: Always use the 32-bit waking vector Len Brown
2008-09-04 9:27 ` [PATCH]: ACPI : Set 32bit and 64bit waking vector in FCAS table Zhao Yakui
2008-09-04 9:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080917072858.GA2659@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.