From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 21:13:38 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] + Message-Id: <20080918141338.bafb84b3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> List-Id: References: <48D20D60.4030001@linutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <48D20D60.4030001@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 22:02:14 +0200 Jean Delvare wrote: > > I got removed from the Cc so I of course didn't see the comments :( > > The copy of Sebastian's mail that went through the lm-sensors list > doesn't have you in Cc. Probably another bug in mailman... Sebastian's original email had Message-ID: <20080916133542.GA2072@www.tglx.de> and your reply had References: <20080916133542.GA2072@www.tglx.de> In-Reply-To: <20080916133542.GA2072@www.tglx.de> Looking at the headers, it seems that I just never received a copy of that email from mailman at all - I just got one copy direct from Sebastian. Is mailman set up to not send duplicate copies to people who are on the cc list? I think that's an admin option. If so, I'd suggest that this be disabled - just send two copies. That might fix the rather seriouis problem which we just hit, and it will make that list behave like all the other Linux lists. I rather like the send-two-copies behaviour. As things stand at present, my lm-sensors mailbox is missing all the emails on which I was cc'ed, so it's a bit of a mess. If I remember to move all the lm-sensors traffic which hits my inbox over into the lm-sensors list folder then presumably things would be fixed up, but that's rather a pain. _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors