From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 19 Sep 2008 13:07:58 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:49117 "EHLO ditditdahdahdah-dahdahdahditdit.dl5rb.org.uk") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S29057233AbYISMHy (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Sep 2008 13:07:54 +0100 Received: from denk.linux-mips.net (denk.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1]) by ditditdahdahdah-dahdahdahditdit.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m8JC7rWK019907; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:07:53 +0200 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by denk.linux-mips.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m8JC7qV9019905; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:07:52 +0200 Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:07:52 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: Atsushi Nemoto , u1@terran.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS checksum fix Message-ID: <20080919120752.GA19877@linux-mips.org> References: <20080917.222350.41199051.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <20080918.002705.78730226.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <20080918220734.GA19222@linux-mips.org> <20080919112304.GB13440@linux-mips.org> <20080919114743.GA19359@linux-mips.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080919114743.GA19359@linux-mips.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 20553 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 01:47:43PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote: > I'm interested in test reports of this on all sorts of configurations - > 32-bit, 64-bit, big / little endian, R2 processors and pre-R2. In > particular Cavium being the only MIPS64 R2 implementation would be > interesting. This definately is stuff which should go upstream for 2.6.27. There was a trivial bug in the R2 code.