From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754912AbYISXSA (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Sep 2008 19:18:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752539AbYISXRw (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Sep 2008 19:17:52 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:36515 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752138AbYISXRw (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Sep 2008 19:17:52 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:17:49 -0500 From: Dean Nelson To: Mike Travis Cc: Ingo Molnar , "Eric W. Biederman" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Jack Steiner , Alan Mayer , jeremy@goop.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Yinghai Lu Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] switch vector_irq[] from irq number to irq_desc pointer v2 Message-ID: <20080919231749.GA10245@sgi.com> References: <20080919200212.GA6528@sgi.com> <20080919200449.GB6528@sgi.com> <48D40A97.2000402@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48D40A97.2000402@sgi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 01:24:55PM -0700, Mike Travis wrote: > > Note that my recent patch from a couple of weeks ago, stripped almost all of > the cpumask_t's from the io_apic functions. Any chance we can apply them > before we add more? > > I'd be willing to merge in Dean's patch over the top of mine (or vice-versa). Sorry Mike, I didn't realize you had any patches against io_apic functions. You might take a look at the second patch in this patchset, I tried to eliminate some of the cpumask_t's from being defined on the stack and to pass only pointers to them as args. I didn't do all that could be done, but just the ones near the main functions I was touching. You may have a better way of doing it then I did. Feel free to do whatever with this patchset. (I'm not going to be reachable until Monday.) FYI, this patchset was built against linux-next. Thanks, Dean