All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "Giacomo A. Catenazzi" <cate@debian.org>
Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com>,
	Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Tigran Aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 05/11] [PATCH 05/11] x86: Moved microcode.c to microcode_intel.c.
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 08:11:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080920061145.GD25713@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48D3AEB5.1000007@debian.org>


* Giacomo A. Catenazzi <cate@debian.org> wrote:

>> That sounds like a single-module solution would be the best way to 
>> go. All dependencies would then be handled inside the module.
>
> Single module probably is more difficult to maintain.

why? In this case we have just two relevant CPU microcode drivers - and 
we dont expect their number to grow significantly. So it should be 
perfectly clean to link everything into a single module.

In fact as this example has shown it a single-module solution has 
numerous advantages, as it simplifies userspace interactions.

Taken to the extreme, a single-image (bzImage) kernel has many 
advantages over a many-modules kernel as well. So we only want to 
modularize when we absolutely have to, and this is not one of those 
cases.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-20  6:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-28 16:44 [patch 00/11] x86: AMD microcode patch loading support v2 Peter Oruba
2008-07-28 16:44 ` [patch 02/11] [PATCH 02/11] x86: Moved Intel microcode patch loader declarations to seperate header file Peter Oruba
2008-07-28 16:44 ` [patch 03/11] [PATCH 03/11] x86: Typedef removal Peter Oruba
2008-07-28 16:44 ` [patch 04/11] [PATCH 04/11] x86: Moved per CPU microcode structure declaration to header file Peter Oruba
2008-07-28 16:44 ` [patch 05/11] [PATCH 05/11] x86: Moved microcode.c to microcode_intel.c Peter Oruba
2008-09-07 19:08   ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-12 11:54     ` Peter Oruba
2008-09-12 13:35       ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-12 13:53         ` Giacomo A. Catenazzi
2008-09-19 11:59         ` Peter Oruba
2008-09-19 12:37           ` Dmitry Adamushko
2008-09-19 12:58             ` Giacomo A. Catenazzi
2008-09-19 13:03               ` Peter Oruba
2008-09-19 13:52                 ` Giacomo A. Catenazzi
2008-09-20  6:11                   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-09-19 14:06                 ` Giacomo A. Catenazzi
2008-09-19 14:29                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-20  6:07                 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-19 13:07           ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-07-28 16:44 ` [patch 06/11] [PATCH 06/11] x86: Code split to two parts Peter Oruba
2008-07-28 16:44 ` [patch 07/11] [PATCH 07/11] x86: Structure declaration renaming Peter Oruba
2008-07-28 16:44 ` [patch 08/11] [PATCH 08/11] x86: Add AMD specific declarations Peter Oruba
2008-07-28 16:44 ` [patch 09/11] [PATCH 09/11] x86: First step of refactoring, introducing microcode_ops Peter Oruba
2008-07-28 16:44 ` [patch 10/11] [PATCH 10/11] x86: Major refactoring Peter Oruba
2008-07-28 19:36   ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-28 19:50     ` Tigran Aivazian
2008-07-28 16:44 ` [patch 11/11] [PATCH 11/11] x86: AMD microcode patch loading support Peter Oruba
2008-07-28 18:01 ` [patch 00/11] x86: AMD microcode patch loading support v2 Ingo Molnar
2008-07-29  8:10   ` [PATCH] x86, microcode support: fix build error Ingo Molnar
2008-07-29  8:10   ` [patch 00/11] x86: AMD microcode patch loading support v2 Ingo Molnar
2008-07-29  8:10   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-29  8:12   ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080920061145.GD25713@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=cate@debian.org \
    --cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.oruba@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.