From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] Document usage of multiple-instances of devpts Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:16:58 -0500 Message-ID: <20080922161658.GA27087@us.ibm.com> References: <20080912174845.GA17350@us.ibm.com> <20080912175347.GK17350@us.ibm.com> <20080919163311.626b715f@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20080920161717.GA23693@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080920161717.GA23693-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: sukadev-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org Cc: kyle-hoO6YkzgTuCM0SS3m2neIg@public.gmane.org, bastian-yyjItF7Rl6lg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org, ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org, xemul-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, Alan Cox List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Quoting sukadev-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org (sukadev-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org): > Alan Cox [alan-qBU/x9rampVanCEyBjwyrvXRex20P6io@public.gmane.org] wrote: > | Ok I'm happy with this patch set. It appears correct as far as the tty > | side is concerned, it looks sensible in terms of interface with the > | devpts layer. > > Alan, Peter: Thanks for review and feedback. > > | > | Really depends what everyone else thinks about the vfs bits and the API > > Maybe I should post to fsdevel, manpages, and lkml for the vfs/api changes. > > Serge, Eric, Pavel: Any comments on the patchset before I do that ? No luck yet finding my random lockup (it *should* be obvious), but do notice that you ignore the return value of get_sb_single() in init_pts_mount(). Certainly that should be fixed. -serge