From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:07:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20080923.150722.141587696.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20080923.140519.268233735.davem@davemloft.net> <21d7e9970809231409r3fdd640h53a72a808266d220@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <21d7e9970809231409r3fdd640h53a72a808266d220-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" To: airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org Cc: jkosina-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org, david.vrabel-kQvG35nSl+M@public.gmane.org, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, chrisl-pghWNbHTmq7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org From: "Dave Airlie" Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 07:09:09 +1000 > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 7:05 AM, David Miller wrote: > > From: Jiri Kosina > > Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:29:16 +0200 (CEST) > > > >> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote: > >> > >> > So I went through the changes from 2.6.27-rc5 until the SHA1 > >> > ID ec0c15afb41fd9ad45b53468b60db50170e22346 and there were > >> > definitely no E1000 or E1000E changes during that time. > >> > >> Some recent comments on [1] seem to indicate that this is somehow coupled > >> into prior problems/panics with Intel graphics. > > > > My current suspicion in all of this is either the GEM kernel patches > > or recent X server. > > > > I don't think OpenSUSE was shipping any of the GEM bits. Good data point, can someone confirm this? Also, what X server version is the effected OpenSUSE shipping? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755289AbYIWWHm (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:07:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751190AbYIWWHe (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:07:34 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:56494 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750806AbYIWWHe (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:07:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:07:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20080923.150722.141587696.davem@davemloft.net> To: airlied@gmail.com Cc: jkosina@suse.cz, david.vrabel@csr.com, rjw@sisk.pl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org, chrisl@vmware.com Subject: Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <21d7e9970809231409r3fdd640h53a72a808266d220@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080923.140519.268233735.davem@davemloft.net> <21d7e9970809231409r3fdd640h53a72a808266d220@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.1 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "Dave Airlie" Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 07:09:09 +1000 > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 7:05 AM, David Miller wrote: > > From: Jiri Kosina > > Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:29:16 +0200 (CEST) > > > >> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote: > >> > >> > So I went through the changes from 2.6.27-rc5 until the SHA1 > >> > ID ec0c15afb41fd9ad45b53468b60db50170e22346 and there were > >> > definitely no E1000 or E1000E changes during that time. > >> > >> Some recent comments on [1] seem to indicate that this is somehow coupled > >> into prior problems/panics with Intel graphics. > > > > My current suspicion in all of this is either the GEM kernel patches > > or recent X server. > > > > I don't think OpenSUSE was shipping any of the GEM bits. Good data point, can someone confirm this? Also, what X server version is the effected OpenSUSE shipping?