From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.188]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 247E0DDF14 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:01:45 +1000 (EST) From: Arnd Bergmann To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Subject: Re: Regarding select() on PPC Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:01:33 +0200 References: <7B7EF7F090B9804A830ACC82F2CDE95D56E14C@insardxms01.ap.sony.com> <200809230746.03234.arnd@arndb.de> <1222149361.12085.101.camel@pasglop> In-Reply-To: <1222149361.12085.101.camel@pasglop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Message-Id: <200809230801.33508.arnd@arndb.de> Cc: "Sadashiiv, Halesh" , linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tuesday 23 September 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 07:46 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > I would definitely switch over the ppc32 __NR_newselect implementation > > to sys_select. For __NR_select, there is no correct solution, the three > > options are the current ppc_select, the real sys_select or sys_ni_syscall. > > Each of these is broken in different ways, but in practice it will never > > be called anyway. > > > > I love archeology. > > Any idea when glibc got fixed ? > No, sorry, I don't have a git history that I can search for that. I have a strong guess that it would be the end of the last century though, probably before 2.3.48, since the comment in there already refers to legacy binaries. Arnd <><