From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] sched: add some comments to the bandwidth code
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:33:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080923133459.915171588@programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20080923133340.929758093@programming.kicks-ass.net
[-- Attachment #1: sched-rt-bw-comment.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3300 bytes --]
Hopefully clarify some of this code a little.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
kernel/sched_rt.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_rt.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -231,6 +231,9 @@ static inline struct rt_bandwidth *sched
#endif /* CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED */
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+/*
+ * We ran out of runtime, see if we can borrow some from our neighbours.
+ */
static int do_balance_runtime(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b = sched_rt_bandwidth(rt_rq);
@@ -250,9 +253,18 @@ static int do_balance_runtime(struct rt_
continue;
spin_lock(&iter->rt_runtime_lock);
+ /*
+ * Either all rqs have inf runtime and there's nothing to steal
+ * or __disable_runtime() below sets a specific rq to inf to
+ * indicate its been disabled and disalow stealing.
+ */
if (iter->rt_runtime == RUNTIME_INF)
goto next;
+ /*
+ * From runqueues with spare time, take 1/n part of their
+ * spare time, but no more than our period.
+ */
diff = iter->rt_runtime - iter->rt_time;
if (diff > 0) {
diff = div_u64((u64)diff, weight);
@@ -274,6 +286,9 @@ next:
return more;
}
+/*
+ * Ensure this RQ takes back all the runtime it lend to its neighbours.
+ */
static void __disable_runtime(struct rq *rq)
{
struct root_domain *rd = rq->rd;
@@ -289,17 +304,33 @@ static void __disable_runtime(struct rq
spin_lock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
spin_lock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock);
+ /*
+ * Either we're all inf and nobody needs to borrow, or we're
+ * already disabled and thus have nothing to do, or we have
+ * exactly the right amount of runtime to take out.
+ */
if (rt_rq->rt_runtime == RUNTIME_INF ||
rt_rq->rt_runtime == rt_b->rt_runtime)
goto balanced;
spin_unlock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock);
+ /*
+ * Calculate the difference between what we started out with
+ * and what we current have, that's the amount of runtime
+ * we lend and now have to reclaim.
+ */
want = rt_b->rt_runtime - rt_rq->rt_runtime;
+ /*
+ * Greedy reclaim, take back as much as we can.
+ */
for_each_cpu_mask(i, rd->span) {
struct rt_rq *iter = sched_rt_period_rt_rq(rt_b, i);
s64 diff;
+ /*
+ * Can't reclaim from ourselves or disabled runqueues.
+ */
if (iter == rt_rq || iter->rt_runtime == RUNTIME_INF)
continue;
@@ -319,8 +350,16 @@ static void __disable_runtime(struct rq
}
spin_lock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock);
+ /*
+ * We cannot be left wanting - that would mean some runtime
+ * leaked out of the system.
+ */
BUG_ON(want);
balanced:
+ /*
+ * Disable all the borrow logic by pretending we have inf
+ * runtime - in which case borrowing doesn't make sense.
+ */
rt_rq->rt_runtime = RUNTIME_INF;
spin_unlock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock);
spin_unlock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
@@ -343,6 +382,9 @@ static void __enable_runtime(struct rq *
if (unlikely(!scheduler_running))
return;
+ /*
+ * Reset each runqueue's bandwidth settings
+ */
for_each_leaf_rt_rq(rt_rq, rq) {
struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b = sched_rt_bandwidth(rt_rq);
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-23 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-23 13:33 [PATCH 0/6] variuos patches lined up for .28 Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-23 13:33 ` [PATCH 1/6] lockstat: fixup signed division Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-23 14:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-23 13:33 ` [PATCH 2/6] sched: fixlet for group load balance Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-23 13:33 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2008-09-23 13:33 ` [PATCH 4/6] sched: more sanity checks on the bandwidth settings Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-23 13:33 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched: fixup buddy selection Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-23 13:33 ` [PATCH 6/6] sched: rework wakeup preemption Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-23 14:23 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080923133459.915171588@programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.