From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.188]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB581DDDE3 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:23:27 +1000 (EST) From: Arnd Bergmann To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Subject: Re: Regarding select() on PPC Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:23:12 +0200 References: <7B7EF7F090B9804A830ACC82F2CDE95D56E206@insardxms01.ap.sony.com> <1222160853.12085.136.camel@pasglop> In-Reply-To: <1222160853.12085.136.camel@pasglop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Message-Id: <200809240823.12484.arnd@arndb.de> Cc: "Sadashiiv, Halesh" , linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tuesday 23 September 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > Means argument checking in ppc_select() can be removed?? > > Than shall I post patch to linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > > ppc_select can probably be removed alltogether and ppc32_select too I think ppc32_select needs to stay. It never did the hack for supporting the old_select calling conventions, but it does the sign extension for the 32 bit arguments, which I think you still want. In any way, both the 32 bit emulation and the native ppc32 code path should do the same thing, which currently they don't. Arnd <><