From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Amit Shah Subject: Re: Remaining passthrough/VT-d tasks list Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:32:02 +0530 Message-ID: <200809241332.02833.amit.shah@redhat.com> References: <0122C7C995D32147B66BF4F440D3016301C49E61@pdsmsx415.ccr.corp.intel.com> <200809241311.51678.amit.shah@redhat.com> <0122C7C995D32147B66BF4F440D3016301C49FE6@pdsmsx415.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Yang, Sheng" , kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Avi Kivity" , benami@il.ibm.com, muli@il.ibm.com, "Kay, Allen M" , "Zhang, Xiantao" To: "Han, Weidong" Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:55873 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751239AbYIXI1I (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2008 04:27:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <0122C7C995D32147B66BF4F440D3016301C49FE6@pdsmsx415.ccr.corp.intel.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * On Wednesday 24 Sep 2008 13:21:25 Han, Weidong wrote: > Amit Shah wrote: >>> - Add dummy driver to hide/unbind passthrough device from >>> host kernel > > This isn't needed; we currently don't assign the device to the guest > > if we find that a driver is already loaded. I intend to change it to > > failing guest start altogether in case we find a module already using > > a device. When a guest exits, we release all the structures and hence > > even unloading kvm is not needed to reclaim the device on the host > > side. > > This task needn't targe 2.6.28. For long term, we need it to make device > assignment more user friendly. How is the current scheme not user friendly? Or, how will adding a "dummy driver" be more user friendly?