From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Amit Shah Subject: Re: Remaining passthrough/VT-d tasks list Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:28:04 +0530 Message-ID: <200809241528.04915.amit.shah@redhat.com> References: <0122C7C995D32147B66BF4F440D3016301C49E61@pdsmsx415.ccr.corp.intel.com> <200809241311.51678.amit.shah@redhat.com> <48D9FE77.4010000@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Yang, Sheng" , "Han, Weidong" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "benami@il.ibm.com" , "muli@il.ibm.com" , "Kay, Allen M" , "Zhang, Xiantao" To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:42537 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751665AbYIXKAr (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2008 06:00:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <48D9FE77.4010000@redhat.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * On Wednesday 24 Sep 2008 14:16:47 Avi Kivity wrote: > Amit Shah wrote: > > I'd say we have about 3 weeks to get things in. > > How do you figure? 2.6.26 was released July 13, we're more than 2.5 > months later. A week for 2.6.28 to open and two weeks for the rc1 window. > Furthermore, I'm not queueing untested patches for 2.6.28 at this time. Of course, I'm not advocating this! If they're tested by Intel, we can push them in. Amit