From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754650AbYIXQem (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:34:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752647AbYIXQef (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:34:35 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:45246 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752231AbYIXQee (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:34:34 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:34:31 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Pawe? Sikora Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [kernel-abi] symbol versioning vs. out-of-tree modules. Message-ID: <20080924163431.GA25014@infradead.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 05:07:59PM +0200, Pawe? Sikora wrote: > Hi All, > > with out-of-tree kernel modules we (users and linux distributions) "we" aka the idiots that use out of tree modules on production systems. Just stop doing that, and your problem is solved.