From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, "Sadashiiv,
Halesh" <halesh.sadashiv@ap.sony.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove bogus ppc_select syscall
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:03:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200809241903.39443.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18650.27350.410563.484089@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
On Wednesday 24 September 2008, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/systbl.h b/arch/powerpc/include/a=
sm/systbl.h
> > index f6cc7a4..5a69b32 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/systbl.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/systbl.h
> > @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ COMPAT_SYS_SPU(gettimeofday)
> > =A0COMPAT_SYS_SPU(settimeofday)
> > =A0COMPAT_SYS_SPU(getgroups)
> > =A0COMPAT_SYS_SPU(setgroups)
> > -SYSX(sys_ni_syscall,sys_ni_syscall,ppc_select)
> > +SYSCALL(sys_ni_syscall)
>=20
> I don't see any reason to remove the old select syscall on 32-bit
> kernels. =A0
Well, the point I made earlier ist that the native ppc32 path should
behave the same way as the compat ppc32 path. If we keep ppc_select
in one way or another, we should also have a compat wrapper for that,
right?
Arnd <><
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-24 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-23 7:16 Regarding select() on PPC Sadashiiv, Halesh
2008-09-23 9:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-24 6:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-09-24 6:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-24 6:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-09-24 7:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-24 21:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-24 6:39 ` [PATCH] remove bogus ppc_select syscall Arnd Bergmann
2008-09-24 16:29 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-09-24 17:03 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2008-10-10 7:40 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-10-10 8:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-10-10 4:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-10-10 7:43 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-10-10 8:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-10-10 23:17 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-10-12 8:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-10-13 2:42 ` i2o driver work with AMCC 460EX? Ayman El-Khashab
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-09-24 9:12 [PATCH] remove bogus ppc_select syscall Sadashiiv, Halesh
2008-09-24 13:46 Sadashiiv, Halesh
2008-09-24 13:49 Sadashiiv, Halesh
2008-10-13 11:59 Sadashiiv, Halesh
2008-10-13 21:40 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-10-13 12:18 Sadashiiv, Halesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200809241903.39443.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=halesh.sadashiv@ap.sony.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.