From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [spi-devel-general] linux-next: manual merge of the pxa tree Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 21:57:47 -0700 Message-ID: <200809242157.47494.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <20080915052750.0b0c924c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <48CE60A6.4000705@whoi.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from smtp126.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.65.185]:38167 "HELO smtp126.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751030AbYIYFE2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Sep 2008 01:04:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net, Eric Miao , Stephen Rothwell Cc: Ned Forrester , linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Monday 15 September 2008, Eric Miao wrote: > >> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fixup (though it could= be > >> fixed in the pxa tree in a merge with Linus' tree). =A0Please chec= k the > >> fixup. > > > > The last word I had from David Brownell, was that Eric should make = his > > patch fit after mine. =A0I think Eric was planning to re-submit, bu= t maybe > > you have saved him the trouble. =A0I will leave it to Eric to decid= e if > > you fixed everything needed. > > >=20 > I'll take off the patch to save Stephen's time on this. Sorry for the > noise. Uh, I have yet to see any version of this patch... could someone post it so the SPI maintainer at least has a chance to look at it?