From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752728AbYIYAT3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:19:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753233AbYIYATO (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:19:14 -0400 Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.188]:20491 "EHLO ti-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753021AbYIYATN (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:19:13 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=Xmy5cqbWJrdXmFNKu/3Q+3UjhSyMx7isnZndhHyZ2bJBcYZbMJl/43cmvmgyvx7WQK Vh/0aHu88q5lNG6AvnXeXRuArSne1k9n4mXQBtQIJbodVvKkpcw9MWHbciFKEv7kcLp/ uIDvZGm+KnnX6RUibd8ob6nN/3QAFB4t3R6ug= Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:19:06 +0800 From: Yan Li To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Alok kataria , Yan Li , Cristi Magherusan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , joerg.roedel@amd.com, rjmaomao@gmail.com, Yinghai Lu , Thomas Gleixner , nancydreaming@gmail.com, akataria@vmware.com, Zachary Amsden , Daniel Hecht Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] VMware guest detection for x86 and x86-64 Message-ID: <20080925001906.GC21049@yantp.cn.ibm.com> References: <48D12490.5010003@zytor.com> <48da36b9.160d6e0a.22a5.ffffec9d@mx.google.com> <1222265424.5708.5.camel@localhost> <20080924142322.GA21049@yantp.cn.ibm.com> <35f686220809240919x631d8f98m5f1d20c2c8e98690@mail.gmail.com> <48DA68FF.3030202@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48DA68FF.3030202@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 09:21:19AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Alok kataria wrote: >> >> Btw, are you pushing these patches for the 2.6.27 release ? If this is >> for the x86 tree(2.6.28) i think we should hold on, until i post the >> proposal for the cpuid patches, so that we can unify this and have a >> generic way to detect on which hypervisor are we running . >> > > I don't think there is any way in hell this is going into 2.6.27. > > For it to make 2.6.28 it will have to be ready very soon. I'd like to see it in 2.6.28 to fix the false warning here. I'll take several comments here and post a improved patch soon (changing code is fast but testing them on VMs here with different configurations are time-consuming). But I think people could just start to test this version of patch since further change will be mostly cosmetic, FWIW. -- Li, Yan