From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
Received: from buildserver.ru.mvista.com (unknown [85.21.88.6])
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750B3DDDEF
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 04:36:43 +1000 (EST)
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 22:36:41 +0400
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/2] QE Pin Multiplexing API
Message-ID: <20080925183641.GA20037@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251
Cc: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com>, Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
Reply-To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/options/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

Here is the sketch, only for RFC. It is tested to work, but there could be
silly thinkos anyway. I'll review the changes once again later...

Anyhow... David, is this approach looks ok? Or I'm hopeless..? ;-)

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1754483AbYIYSgv@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754483AbYIYSgv (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:36:51 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752934AbYIYSgn
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:36:43 -0400
Received: from rtsoft3.corbina.net ([85.21.88.6]:40400 "EHLO
	buildserver.ru.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752919AbYIYSgn (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:36:43 -0400
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 22:36:41 +0400
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Cc: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>,
       Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>,
       Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>, Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com>,
       Laurent Pinchart <laurentp@cse-semaphore.com>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/2] QE Pin Multiplexing API
Message-ID: <20080925183641.GA20037@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
Reply-To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Here is the sketch, only for RFC. It is tested to work, but there could be
silly thinkos anyway. I'll review the changes once again later...

Anyhow... David, is this approach looks ok? Or I'm hopeless..? ;-)

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2