From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
To: Steven Noonan <steven@uplinklabs.net>
Cc: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>,
"linville@tuxdriver.com" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
"johannes@sipsolutions.net" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"yi.zhu@intel.com" <yi.zhu@intel.com>,
Luis Rodriguez <Luis.Rodriguez@Atheros.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC V3] mac80211: re-enable aggregation on 2.6.27
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 18:51:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080926015100.GR6204@tesla> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f488382f0809251243x472ff579n8ada22e8f7110aae@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:43:36PM -0700, Steven Noonan wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com> wrote:
> > Re-enable aggregation by addressing skb->cb overwrites
> > after insertion into the qdisc. Aggregation was disabled
> > after the new TX multiqueue changes were introduced. Instead
> > of relying on the skb->cb we use two flags on the skb.
> >
>
> I seem to recall that implementing aggregation was causing issues with
> ath9k
Just ath9k, there are only two aggregation capable drivers in the
kernel right now, Intel's iwlagn and ath9k. Intel's worked just fine
in my tests.
> among others (in particular, ath9k was getting slow throughput).
Yes, but it seems this is a general throughput issue now, not just
related to aggregation. We have been working hard on trying to find
what the cause to the throughput issue is.
> How's throughput with this version of the aggregation patch?
Please test and let us know, try HT40 on 11a. We're keen on resolving
this just as with the MIB interrupt issue you say ;)
BTW you need more than this patch to get aggregation working. Below
are the patches you'll need on top of 2.6.27-rc7 to get aggregation
working (and your MIB interrupt storm fixed) with ath9k:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mcgrof/patches/ath9k/2008-09-25
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-26 1:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-25 19:34 [RFC V3] mac80211: re-enable aggregation on 2.6.27 Tomas Winkler
2008-09-25 19:43 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-26 1:51 ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2008-09-26 2:45 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-28 2:49 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-29 17:29 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-26 1:40 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-26 12:34 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080926015100.GR6204@tesla \
--to=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
--cc=Luis.Rodriguez@Atheros.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=steven@uplinklabs.net \
--cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
--cc=yi.zhu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.