From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Fjellstrom Subject: Re: Status of pci passthrough work? Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 10:07:53 -0600 Message-ID: <200809271007.54111.tfjellstrom@shaw.ca> References: <200809262020.16885.tfjellstrom@shaw.ca> <200809270940.36755.tfjellstrom@shaw.ca> <48DE5759.6080908@t-online.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: kvm@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from idcmail-mo2no.shaw.ca ([64.59.134.9]:61719 "EHLO idcmail-mo2no.shaw.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751948AbYI0QHz (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Sep 2008 12:07:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <48DE5759.6080908@t-online.de> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Saturday 27 September 2008, Jan C. Bernauer wrote: > Thomas Fjellstrom wrote: > > How did you manage to pull together those patches? They all seem so > > old, and > > > won't likely apply cleanly to git head :( > > Which patches do you mean? The patches for kvm? > There is a nice repository managed by Amit Shah: > Linux source: > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/amit/kvm.git;a=summary > > kvm-userspace: > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/amit/kvm-userspace.git;a=summary > > I think this compiled without too much problems. Ah, the pci branches in the main kvm.git tree seemed to be months old, and I assumed thats where the code was kept. > Best regards, > Jan > -- Thomas Fjellstrom tfjellstrom@shaw.ca