From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Cc: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>,
Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 22:53:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080927205357.GC31650@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200809261540.31443.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
* Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> wrote:
> The problem seems to be that Frans has some PCI devices that are not
> configured by the BIOS, and their BARs contain zero. A PNP quirk
> checks for overlaps of PCI devices and PNP devices, and those zero-
> valued BARs of course conflict with the PNP motherboard devices that
> describe legacy hardware.
>
> Here's another approach based on section 3.5 of the PCI Firmware spec.
> It says:
>
> Since not all devices may be configured prior to the operating
> system handoff, the operating system needs to know whether a
> specific BAR register has been configured by firmware. The operating
> system makes the determination by checking the I/O Enable, and
> Memory Enable bits in the device's command register, and Expansion
> ROM BAR enable bits. If the enable bit is set, then the corresponding
> resource register has been configured.
>
> So instead of checking whether the BAR contains zero, the patch below
> checks the I/O, Mem, and ROM BAR enable bits to determine whether a
> BAR is enabled.
cool! Looks like a pretty significant fix, for all sorts of legacy
devices. Worth backporting?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-27 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-09 10:50 [bisected][resend] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Frans Pop
2008-09-09 11:22 ` Rene Herman
2008-09-09 15:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-09-09 16:26 ` Frans Pop
2008-09-09 17:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-09-09 18:31 ` Rene Herman
2008-09-18 5:10 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-09-20 23:49 ` Frans Pop
2008-09-20 23:56 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-09-26 21:40 ` [Bug #11550] " Bjorn Helgaas
2008-09-27 15:16 ` Frans Pop
2008-09-27 20:53 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-03-04 20:17 ` Frans Pop
2009-03-04 21:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-03-20 2:07 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-03-23 15:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-09-10 7:39 ` [bisected][resend] " Frans Pop
2008-09-10 21:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-09-11 16:58 ` Frans Pop
2008-11-07 9:51 ` Frans Pop
2008-11-07 10:00 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-09-12 18:59 2.6.27-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-12 19:06 ` [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-12 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-12 22:52 ` Rene Herman
2008-09-12 22:52 ` Rene Herman
2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-27 15:54 2.6.27-rc7-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-27 15:56 ` [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-27 15:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-04 17:28 2.6.27-rc8-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-04 17:32 ` [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-04 17:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-07 22:34 ` Frans Pop
2008-10-07 22:34 ` Frans Pop
2008-10-25 21:04 2.6.28-rc1-git1: Reported regressions 2.6.26 -> 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-26 16:43 ` Frans Pop
2008-10-26 16:43 ` Frans Pop
2008-11-02 16:47 2.6.28-rc2-git7: Reported regressions 2.6.26 -> 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:49 ` [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080927205357.GC31650@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=elendil@planet.nl \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=rene.herman@gmail.com \
--cc=rene.herman@keyaccess.nl \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.