From: Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>,
Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86: Add UV bios call infrastructure v2
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 09:31:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080929143144.GA116670@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080928150106.GA204845@sgi.com>
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 10:01:07AM -0500, Russ Anderson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 09:21:35AM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 15:02 -0500, Russ Anderson wrote:
> > > Index: linux/include/asm-x86/efi.h
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux.orig/include/asm-x86/efi.h 2008-09-26 14:13:24.000000000 -0500
> > > +++ linux/include/asm-x86/efi.h 2008-09-26 14:13:36.000000000 -0500
> > > @@ -49,6 +49,20 @@ extern u64 efi_call5(void *fp, u64 arg1,
> > > extern u64 efi_call6(void *fp, u64 arg1, u64 arg2, u64 arg3,
> > > u64 arg4, u64 arg5, u64 arg6);
> > >
> > > +
> > > +#ifndef CONFIG_EFI
> > > +/*
> > > + * IF EFI is not configured, have the EFI calls return -ENOSYS.
> > > + */
> > > +#define efi_call0(_f) (-ENOSYS)
> > > +#define efi_call1(_f, _a1) (-ENOSYS)
> > > +#define efi_call2(_f, _a1, _a2) (-ENOSYS)
> > > +#define efi_call3(_f, _a1, _a2, _a3) (-ENOSYS)
> > > +#define efi_call4(_f, _a1, _a2, _a3, _a4) (-ENOSYS)
> > > +#define efi_call5(_f, _a1, _a2, _a3, _a4, _a5) (-ENOSYS)
> > > +#define efi_call6(_f, _a1, _a2, _a3, _a4, _a5, _a6) (-ENOSYS)
> > > +#endif /* CONFIG_EFI */
> > > +
> > > #define efi_call_phys0(f) \
> > > efi_call0((void *)(f))
> > > #define efi_call_phys1(f, a1) \
> >
> > efi_call_virt<n> and efi_call_phys<n> is the API instead of efi_call<n>.
>
> #define efi_call_virt6(f, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6) \
> efi_call6((void *)(efi.systab->runtime->f), (u64)(a1), (u64)(a2), \
> (u64)(a3), (u64)(a4), (u64)(a5), (u64)(a6))
>
> efi_call_virt6() uses efi.systab->runtime->f.
> My call needs to use uv_systab, not efi.systab.
After thinking about this, if a new runtime call was added to
efi_runtime_services_t, then the existing efi_call_virt<n> could be
used. This would remove the need to create uv_systab. I'll post
a patch shortly.
--
Russ Anderson, OS RAS/Partitioning Project Lead
SGI - Silicon Graphics Inc rja@sgi.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-29 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-26 20:02 [PATCH 2/4] x86: Add UV bios call infrastructure v2 Russ Anderson
2008-09-27 1:21 ` Huang Ying
2008-09-27 16:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-28 15:01 ` Russ Anderson
2008-09-29 14:31 ` Russ Anderson [this message]
2008-10-02 8:05 ` huang ying
2008-10-02 8:02 ` huang ying
2008-10-02 15:34 ` Russ Anderson
2008-10-03 9:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-07 20:57 ` Russ Anderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080929143144.GA116670@sgi.com \
--to=rja@sgi.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.