From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:30:20 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Jeremy Kerr Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] sputrace : use marker_synchronize_unregister() Message-ID: <20080930113020.GE21367@elte.hu> References: <48E08B05.7030802@cn.fujitsu.com> <200809301028.21485.jk@ozlabs.org> <20080930095520.GB7557@elte.hu> <200809302122.36117.jk@ozlabs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200809302122.36117.jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers , Lai Jiangshan , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Steven Rostedt , Christoph Hellwig , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Andrew Morton , "Paul E. McKenney" , cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org, Peter Zijlstra List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , * Jeremy Kerr wrote: > Ingo, > > > that wont work very well as the patch relies on the new > > marker_synchronize_unregister() facility. > > d'oh, right you are. Should I leave this in your hands to merge? would be nice if you could give your Acked-by for the sputrace bits, then we can merge it. It's a oneliner so it shouldnt cause merging trouble in linux-next. Ingo From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753392AbYI3LbT (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:31:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751551AbYI3LbK (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:31:10 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:49883 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751446AbYI3LbJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:31:09 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:30:20 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Jeremy Kerr Cc: cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org, Mathieu Desnoyers , Lai Jiangshan , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Steven Rostedt , Christoph Hellwig , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Andrew Morton , "Paul E. McKenney" , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] sputrace : use marker_synchronize_unregister() Message-ID: <20080930113020.GE21367@elte.hu> References: <48E08B05.7030802@cn.fujitsu.com> <200809301028.21485.jk@ozlabs.org> <20080930095520.GB7557@elte.hu> <200809302122.36117.jk@ozlabs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200809302122.36117.jk@ozlabs.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Jeremy Kerr wrote: > Ingo, > > > that wont work very well as the patch relies on the new > > marker_synchronize_unregister() facility. > > d'oh, right you are. Should I leave this in your hands to merge? would be nice if you could give your Acked-by for the sputrace bits, then we can merge it. It's a oneliner so it shouldnt cause merging trouble in linux-next. Ingo