All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Gavrilov <angavrilov@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>,
	Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-gui: Do not automatically stage file after merge tool finishes
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:00:57 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200809301200.57353.angavrilov@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48E1CA7F.5050501@viscovery.net>

On Tuesday 30 September 2008 10:43:11 Johannes Sixt wrote:
> From: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
> 
> If a merge tool was invoked on a conflicted file and the tool completed,
> then the conflicted file was staged automatically. However, the fact that
> the user closed the merge tool cannot be understood as the unequivocal
> sign that the conflict was completely resolved. For example, the user
> could have decided to postpone the resolution of the conflict, or could
> have accidentally closed the tool. We better leave the file unstaged and
> let the user stage it explicitly.
> 
> Since the file is not staged anyway, the check for an unmodified
> timestamp is pointless and removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
> ---
>  I had sent this patch last week (but marked as RFC). Here it is again
>  without 'RFC' because I think it is a necessary change.

Now that the issue with staging of working copy files is more or less
resolved, I agree that it is better to disable automatic staging.

Alexander

      reply	other threads:[~2008-09-30  8:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-30  6:43 [PATCH] git-gui: Do not automatically stage file after merge tool finishes Johannes Sixt
2008-09-30  8:00 ` Alexander Gavrilov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200809301200.57353.angavrilov@gmail.com \
    --to=angavrilov@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
    --cc=spearce@spearce.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.