From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1753530AbYI3Seh@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753530AbYI3Seh (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:34:37 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752900AbYI3Se3
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:34:29 -0400
Received: from mtagate6.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.139]:33725 "EHLO
	mtagate6.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752546AbYI3Se3 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:34:29 -0400
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:33:10 +0300
From: Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@il.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       kvm@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
       David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
       Amit Shah <amit.shah@qumranet.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
       FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] x86/iommu: change Calgary to use dma_ops register
	interface
Message-ID: <20080930183310.GB20341@il.ibm.com>
References: <1222107681-8185-1-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <1222107681-8185-7-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <20080930111028.GC12529@elte.hu> <20080930133024.GA20341@il.ibm.com> <20080930153815.GA22693@elte.hu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080930153815.GA22693@elte.hu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 05:38:15PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@il.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > > > +static int calgary_device_supported(struct device *dev)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	return translation_enabled(find_iommu_table(dev));
> > > > +}
> > 
> > Sure, but I prefer the explicit form since it lends itself to easier
> > debugging (oops line numbers, adding printks, etc.).
> 
> we never do that for simple stuff like this. The kernel would be
> twice as large if we did.

I assume you are talking about the source size, because the generated
code size should be exactly the same.

In any case, arguing where to place the semi-colon is a waste of
time. Do as you see fit.

Cheers,
Muli
-- 
The First Workshop on I/O Virtualization (WIOV '08)
Dec 2008, San Diego, CA, http://www.usenix.org/wiov08/
                      xxx
SYSTOR 2009---The Israeli Experimental Systems Conference
http://www.haifa.il.ibm.com/conferences/systor2009/