From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752878AbYJBFik (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Oct 2008 01:38:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751474AbYJBFid (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Oct 2008 01:38:33 -0400 Received: from smtp111.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.84.64]:41024 "HELO smtp111.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751277AbYJBFic (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Oct 2008 01:38:32 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=TUmzkNKYRiSKYAftv6Bi+Myrk88vGTJvMF5gZkOYtyW6Lli+/ltlL9C3w26Lf1krcqvsZmz3U5qFG3/BA3rjnn38WEaE58Gfmgt2o3vXHGz1XfyaWdYj1RjwN1DRw6skx2XHqpWo2QD+uWvPOylQ0pEd1Ih8N5E5zs5gZUyTa7k= ; X-YMail-OSG: BU36v9QVM1nv8XdrabpyiH7N0706.ssTQcLDEiwIRvLWW54s5h96g7vBgEUj2j7d1WmqYL9ZG9z9LI9B0VNXcXG9w4keTckZSmraVfH5gZ6xWW5u36KzTgsWQbn3XBIzxJ.iZ.V.eCyhwepuW.d9vDoiC1JIPQ-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: Nick Piggin To: Hugh Dickins Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: unify shmem and tiny-shmem Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 15:38:25 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Matt Mackall , Nick Piggin , David Howells , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton References: <1222818570.13453.5.camel@calx> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810021538.25314.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 02 October 2008 04:39, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Matt Mackall wrote: > > (This applies on top of Nick's second tiny-shmem patch, which hasn't > > made it to mainline yet(!). > > Gosh, thanks for mentioning that, you're right, it hasn't. I saw > git pull updating mm/tiny-shmem.c a few days ago, and took it for > granted that that was the #ifndef CONFIG_MMU fixed version; but it > was the earlier one without that fix, despite us all knowing that > fix was needed. I'd have pushed it myself for -rc8 if I'd realized > it was still missing: Nick, please push it to Linus a.s.a.p. (with > Acks from Matt and David and me) - or ask me to do so (I'm not sure > when Andrew is back up and running). Linus must have missed it I guess, because I think I did address it to him. If you or Matt or Andrew push it up, it might get taken seriously ;)