From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Levon Subject: Re: [PATCH] [Xend] Move some backend configuration Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 18:21:36 +0100 Message-ID: <20081002172136.GA10511@totally.trollied.org.uk> References: <20081002150929.GC1088@totally.trollied.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 04:25:39PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote: > > They're both tool stack values, so in the sense that we can permanently > > patch xenstored, you don't need the change, you're right. Although, we're > > already > > carrying way way too much customizations. > > Well, you don't need to patch xenstored. Your customised toolstack -- the > one that consumes these extra nodes -- can also open them up, right? The > only reason to open them in xend is if that is the difference between them > working and not working running against the default open-source toolstack. > > I will allow these through if there is a net win for compatibility with the > default open-source toolstack. But I don't particularly want to do so just > to save you a one-line patch to your xend or equivalent. I should have read your fix. We will probably do that one-liner to xend too (the toolstack lives at least two levels above xend, so it's not the best place). thanks, john