From: Kees Cook <kees.cook@canonical.com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ELF: implement AT_RANDOM for future glibc use
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 22:15:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081003051543.GQ10632@outflux.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081003005258.7FEDE154212@magilla.localdomain>
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 05:52:58PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> I think the safe available AT_* values to use are 25, 26.
Out of curiosity, why are there gaps? I figure I can include some
comments in that header to explain the gaps for future AT_* creations.
> I would configure the size in bytes. Ulrich suggested it be 16 bytes on
> both 32-bit and 64-bit machines.
I was trying to make the size compile-time static so I could avoid
kmalloc'ing a buffer for get_random_bytes(). But maybe avoid that isn't
sensible?
As for 16 bytes on both 32bit and 64bit, I was aiming to have 4
pointer-sized random values. 16 works for 32bit, but I was hoping to
have 32 on 64bit. Perhaps I am over-estimating?
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Ubuntu Security Team
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-03 5:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20081001201116.GD12527@outflux.net>
[not found] ` <48E3EFD6.2010704@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20081001215657.GH12527@outflux.net>
[not found] ` <20081001220948.GC32107@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>
[not found] ` <20081001222706.68E7E1544B4@magilla.localdomain>
2008-10-03 0:16 ` [PATCH] ELF: implement AT_RANDOM for future glibc use Kees Cook
2008-10-03 0:43 ` Jakub Jelinek
2008-10-03 5:25 ` Kees Cook
2008-10-03 5:29 ` Kees Cook
2008-10-03 5:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-03 6:25 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-10-03 14:50 ` [PATCH] ELF: implement AT_RANDOM for glibc PRNG seeding Kees Cook
2008-10-03 14:56 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-10-03 14:57 ` Jakub Jelinek
2008-10-03 17:33 ` Kees Cook
2008-10-03 17:41 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-10-03 17:59 ` [PATCH v5] " Kees Cook
2008-10-18 5:42 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-10-21 20:01 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-21 20:22 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-10-27 5:46 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-03 0:52 ` [PATCH] ELF: implement AT_RANDOM for future glibc use Roland McGrath
2008-10-03 5:15 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2008-10-03 20:22 ` Roland McGrath
2008-10-06 6:00 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-06 17:50 ` Kees Cook
2008-10-06 18:25 ` David Wagner
2008-10-06 20:23 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-06 22:16 ` David Wagner
2008-10-06 19:26 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-06 22:01 ` Kees Cook
2008-10-06 23:19 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-06 23:29 ` Kees Cook
2008-10-06 23:44 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-06 22:07 ` Kees Cook
2008-10-06 23:28 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-06 23:58 ` Roland McGrath
2008-10-07 0:08 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-10-07 0:31 ` Kees Cook
2008-10-07 0:57 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-10-07 1:44 ` Kees Cook
2008-10-07 1:51 ` Ulrich Drepper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081003051543.GQ10632@outflux.net \
--to=kees.cook@canonical.com \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.