From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Hibernation: Introduce new system state for the last phase of hibernation Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 05:43:55 -0700 Message-ID: <20081003054355.e3a3ac79.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <200808290002.55026.rjw@sisk.pl> <200809300010.39000.rjw@sisk.pl> <20081003013557.42ce685d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <200810031327.19293.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:40510 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751474AbYJCMoM (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Oct 2008 08:44:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200810031327.19293.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Jeff Garzik , Tejun Heo , ACPI Devel Maling List , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Renninger , Robert Hancock , LKML , Frans Pop , Maciej Rutecki On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:27:18 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > > Can we just create a new global? > > > > extern bool system_entering_hibernation_or_whatever; > > Yes, we can, but what about: > > extern bool system_entering_hibernation(void); > > that will become a static inline in case of !CONFIG_HIBERNATION, > and using a static variable? Sure, even better.