From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [patch twl] twl4030-core -- more cleanups Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 07:09:19 -0700 Message-ID: <200810030709.19790.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <200810021221.20286.david-b@pacbell.net> <200810030115.54197.david-b@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from smtp115.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.64.88]:23441 "HELO smtp115.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751682AbYJCOJ1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:09:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Pakaravoor, Jagadeesh" Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" On Friday 03 October 2008, Pakaravoor, Jagadeesh wrote: > > (And then there's the way every SIH handler seems to > > be getting its own irq_chip and handler thread. =A0I'm > > sure that can be done much better.) >=20 > So, is there going to be a change in the current way, > of spawning a separate thread, for power and gpio irqs? I'm thinking about it. Notice the core has twl4030_mod_regs, which is almost enough to take over irq_chip duties by itself. And it also has a thread handy ...=20 - Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html