From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: [patch 2.6.27-rc8-omap 0/7] resend of pending TWL patches Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 08:57:37 -0700 Message-ID: <200810030857.37888.david-b@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp127.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.65.186]:32595 "HELO smtp127.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752602AbYJCQbe (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:31:34 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org This flushes my queue of TWL (and related) patches that seem ready to merge: - remove extra headers from RTC driver - remove RTC header - remove pwrirq header - core cleanups - gpiolib to_irq() feature - implement to_irq() for OMAP gpios - ... and for TWL gpios At that point the twl4030-core code will be ready to enter the MFD queue IMO ... there've not been many review comments other than mine (which were mostly addressed in the "core cleanups" patch above). The main open issues with respect to the TWL core seem to relate to IRQ handling. I've had a bright idea that I think will solve a bunch of issues at once, but that can/should go separately. And then there will still be the issue of genirq support for threaded IRQs -- which isn't quite available yet. (One observation is that we should prefer to get drivers in mainline even if they're not yet fully cooked ... and mainline is happy with that model. In this case we'll have cleaned up lots of ragged edges, but not yet many of the IRQ bits.) - Dave