From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: <PING> Re: [patch x86/core] x86: allow number of additional hotplug CPUs to be set at compile time
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 12:28:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081005102835.GA8947@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081004183014.769836ff@redhat.com>
* Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com> wrote:
> Yes, it works and I don't see how it could cause any problems.
>
> Ingo, can we get this in 2.6.27? You can drop my original patch.
>
> Tested-by: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
looks good, applied to tip/x86/core, thanks!
it's too late for v2.6.27 (and not a serious regression anyway), but i
marked it for .27.1 backporting.
Your other patch still makes sense - as additional_cpus is an existing
boot parameter it can be specified at .config time as well. You should
not enable it in a distro kernel though, if you intend to support real
hotplug CPU hardware. (which is extremely rare btw.)
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-05 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-01 23:19 [patch x86/core] x86: allow number of additional hotplug CPUs to be set at compile time Chuck Ebbert
2008-10-02 8:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-02 19:30 ` [patch x86/core] x86: allow number of additional hotplug CPUs to be set at compile time, V2 Chuck Ebbert
2008-10-02 19:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-02 19:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-10-02 19:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-02 9:12 ` [patch x86/core] x86: allow number of additional hotplug CPUs to be set at compile time Andi Kleen
2008-10-02 19:25 ` Chuck Ebbert
2008-10-02 19:44 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-02 20:09 ` Chuck Ebbert
2008-10-02 20:40 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-04 16:52 ` <PING> " Andi Kleen
2008-10-04 22:30 ` Chuck Ebbert
2008-10-05 10:28 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-10-05 14:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-05 15:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-05 15:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-05 15:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-05 20:39 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-05 21:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-05 22:45 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-05 20:28 ` Andi Kleen
[not found] <bijiX-86S-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <bisvP-3es-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <biC2k-7cR-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <biCbU-7lA-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <biCOy-8ep-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <biD7T-5N-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <bjiEh-2MC-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <bjnXc-1ec-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <bjz2s-78A-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <bjDfK-40E-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <bjDIN-4L8-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <bjEbU-5eX-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <bjIIi-2Oi-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <bjJOk-49Q-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <bjKAv-5bK-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
2008-10-06 10:59 ` Bodo Eggert
2008-10-06 13:22 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081005102835.GA8947@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.