From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>,
Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias@gmail.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 ACPI: Blacklist two HP machines with buggy BIOSes (Re: 2.6.27-rc8+ - first impressions)
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 19:15:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200810061915.11936.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0810060749570.3208@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>
On Monday, 6 of October 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Mon, 6 Oct 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately some of the recent IO-APIC changes made the bug show
> > up. To prevent this from happening, blacklist machines that are
> > known to be affected (nx6115 and 6715b in this particular case).
>
> Can you point to exactly _which_ recent change made it show up? I'd really
> like to know. _What_ was it that made us suddenly need this quirk when it
> wasn't necessary before? I'd like to understand the root cause here.
On my box it was caused by:
commit 691874fa96d6349a8b60f8ea9c2bae52ece79941
Author: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org>
Date: Tue May 27 21:19:51 2008 +0100
x86: I/O APIC: timer through 8259A second-chance
Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
and the whole story is described in this (huge) thread:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121358440508410&w=4
> And how did you even start looking at that strange ACPI override?
Well, Matthew Garrett told us about that happening on the nx6125:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121396307411930&w=4
and then Maciej analysed the breakage on the basis of a DSDT from the nx6325:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121401068718826&w=4
As far as the Dmitry's and Jason's boxes are concerned, I recognized the
symptoms and asked them to verify that the blacklisting helped.
It appears that the buggy BIOS code has been copy-pasted to the entire range of
machines, for no good reason.
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-06 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-05 18:36 2.6.27-rc8+ - first impressions Dmitry Torokhov
2008-10-05 18:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-05 19:06 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-10-05 19:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-05 19:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-05 21:18 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-10-05 21:40 ` Parag Warudkar
2008-10-05 22:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-06 6:23 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-10-06 9:59 ` [PATCH] x86 ACPI: Blacklist two HP machines with buggy BIOSes (Re: 2.6.27-rc8+ - first impressions) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-06 14:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-06 15:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-06 17:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-06 17:51 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-10-06 17:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-06 20:59 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-06 21:39 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-10-06 22:11 ` [PATCH] x86: SB450: skip IRQ0 override if it is not routed to INT2 of IOAPIC Andreas Herrmann
2008-10-07 3:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-07 3:51 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-10-07 4:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-07 11:19 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-10-07 15:25 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-10-07 20:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-06 23:10 ` [PATCH] x86 ACPI: Blacklist two HP machines with buggy BIOSes (Re: 2.6.27-rc8+ - first impressions) Andi Kleen
2008-10-07 1:35 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-10-07 4:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-07 5:38 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-07 11:45 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-10-07 12:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-08 8:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-06 17:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2008-10-06 17:54 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-10-05 19:10 ` 2.6.27-rc8+ - first impressions Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-06 6:28 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-10-06 19:53 ` Andreas Herrmann
2008-10-07 3:42 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-10-07 9:10 ` Andreas Herrmann
2008-10-07 11:37 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-10-07 12:07 ` Parag Warudkar
2008-10-08 1:07 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-10-07 13:19 ` Andreas Herrmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200810061915.11936.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=jason.vas.dias@gmail.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.