From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/5]: XFS: Prevent use-after-free caused by synchronous
	inode reclaim
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 04:20:58 -0400
Message-ID: <20081009082058.GA6637@infradead.org>
References: <1223416332-7026-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20081009042134.GD9597@disturbed> <20081009070245.GA16621@infradead.org> <20081009080741.GF9597@disturbed>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, xfs@oss.sgi.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:46997 "EHLO
	bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752548AbYJIIU7 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 9 Oct 2008 04:20:59 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20081009080741.GF9597@disturbed>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 07:07:41PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Yeah, I was thinking of doing exactly that in this patch, but I
> figured that I'd just do the minimum needed to fix the bug because
> we're getting close to the next merge window.

Yeah, should be a separate patch, just making public mental notes so
this gets eventually done..