From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl,
dipankar@in.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: RCU hang on cpu re-hotplug with 2.6.27rc8
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 04:44:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081009114449.GA6628@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081009045646.GB24560@one.firstfloor.org>
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 06:56:46AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> [fix up Thomas' address to not bounce]
>
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 06:33:21PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > The attached patch (similar to one in -tip, but set up for mainline and
> > tweaked to make stall-checking on by default) should get you a stack
> > trace of any CPUs holding up RCU grace periods for more than about
> > three seconds.
> >
> > On the off-chance that this helps.
>
> It actually does. The stall detector makes the online echo return
> after three seconds, although it's not 100% clear to me why.
Interesting. This behavior would be consistent with the CPU entering
dyntick-idle mode without RCU's being aware of this. Except that your
earlier .config file says "# CONFIG_NO_HZ is not set". And that would
mean that the CPU really should be invoking RCU's state machine every
scheduling tick.
I confess confusion.
Thanx, Paul
> here's the backtrace
>
> RCU detected CPU 14 stall (t=4295149800/5928 jiffies)
> Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.27-rc9 #5
>
> Call Trace:
> <IRQ> [<ffffffff8025d188>] __rcu_pending+0x6e/0x1d9
> [<ffffffff8025d329>] rcu_pending+0x36/0x6e
> [<ffffffff8023b480>] update_process_times+0x37/0x5b
> [<ffffffff8024be72>] tick_periodic+0x68/0x74
> [<ffffffff8024be9f>] tick_handle_periodic+0x21/0x66
> [<ffffffff8021bcd2>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x8a/0xa8
> [<ffffffff8020bfe6>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x66/0x70
> <EOI> [<ffffffff803adb39>] ? acpi_safe_halt+0x2b/0x3e
> [<ffffffff803adbfa>] ? acpi_idle_enter_c1+0xae/0x102
> [<ffffffff804ffdd6>] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0x70/0xa2
> [<ffffffff8020a097>] ? cpu_idle+0x7e/0x9c
> [<ffffffff805bef4a>] ? start_secondary+0x157/0x15c
>
> Timer issue?
>
>
> -Andi
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-09 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-06 14:12 scheduler hang on cpu re-hotplug with 2.6.27rc8 Andi Kleen
2008-10-06 23:28 ` RCU " Andi Kleen
2008-10-07 3:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-07 7:15 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-07 15:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-07 15:49 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-07 16:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-07 21:09 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-07 21:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-09 1:08 ` [PATCH] rudimentary tracing for Classic RCU Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-09 6:20 ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-10-09 6:55 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-09 7:05 ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-10-09 7:14 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-10-09 7:26 ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-10-09 8:06 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-10 11:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-09 11:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-09 11:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-09 10:23 ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2008-10-09 10:53 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-09 11:44 ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2008-10-09 11:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-09 13:01 ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2008-10-10 3:44 ` [PATCH] v2 " Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-13 23:09 ` [PATCH] v3 " Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-14 3:53 ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-10-14 14:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-23 11:12 ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-10-26 21:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-27 21:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-27 23:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-29 1:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-29 1:31 ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-10-30 15:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-09 1:33 ` RCU hang on cpu re-hotplug with 2.6.27rc8 Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-09 4:56 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-09 7:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-09 8:22 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-09 11:44 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081009114449.GA6628@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.