Re: git confused by rename

["Michael P. Soulier" <msoulier@digitaltorque.ca>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1162 bytes --]

On 10/10/08 Junio C Hamano said:
> The above observation of mine is correct, but I forgot that "git status"
> (and the comment in the commit template from "git commit") is generated
> internally with "diff-index -B -M".  So if
> 
>  (0) had A but not B in the HEAD commit;
>  (1) you created B that is very similar to the original A; and
>  (2) you modified A beyond recognition;

Which, FTR, is what I did. 

I copied A -> B for its boilerplate, and then hacked them both up, although B
consisted mostly of content that I removed from A (a refactoring exercise).

> This however makes me wonder if "diff-index -B -M" should say B is copied
> (instead of being renamed) from A and A is modified in such a case.  I do
> not think we would want to make such a change without thinking things,
> through.

Gotcha. Indeed though, I did cp A -> B, and if A still exists then it
obviously was not renamed.

Thanks,
Mike
-- 
Michael P. Soulier <msoulier@digitaltorque.ca>
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It
takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite
direction." --Albert Einstein

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 187 bytes --]