From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Cc: Alexey Starikovskiy <aystarik@gmail.com>,
Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>,
linux acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: acpi-test tree on eeepc: EC error message on second resume
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:54:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200810112254.09094.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48F100CA.2050600@suse.de>
On Saturday, 11 of October 2008, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> No, we discussed this before -- we are outside of the transaction, thus
> >> no GPE
> >> activity could interfere with ec_check_ibf0.
> >
> > Ok, this is in the process context and we don't really expect to get an
> > interrupt at this point, but what happens if the EC generates an event that's
> > not related to any transiaction. Is that guaranteed to never happen?
> Interrupt handler in this case can't cause a change to status register, thus our
> read of it will not be affected by interrupt.
Ok, thanks.
Alan, does the patch work for you?
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-11 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-11 16:57 acpi-test tree on eeepc: EC error message on second resume Alan Jenkins
2008-10-11 17:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-11 17:12 ` Alan Jenkins
2008-10-11 17:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-11 18:15 ` Alan Jenkins
2008-10-11 18:39 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-10-11 19:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-11 19:31 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-10-11 19:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-11 19:38 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-10-11 20:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2008-10-12 9:13 ` Alan Jenkins
2008-10-12 19:23 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-10-13 5:56 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-10-13 8:22 ` Alan Jenkins
2008-10-13 16:39 ` Alan Jenkins
2008-10-15 22:02 ` [PATCH] ACPI: EC: Check for IBF=0 periodically if not in GPE mode Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-10-16 22:14 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200810112254.09094.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk \
--cc=astarikovskiy@suse.de \
--cc=aystarik@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.