From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Schwebel Subject: Re: Getting physical addresses of mmap'd pages from userspace Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:23:03 +0200 Message-ID: <20081013132303.GU9852@pengutronix.de> References: <200810101815.06249.thomas.cooksey@trolltech.com> <20081010191213.GC9852@pengutronix.de> <200810130833.26399.thomas.cooksey@trolltech.com> <20081013070017.GH9852@pengutronix.de> <48F34400.4000404@billgatliff.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48F34400.4000404@billgatliff.com> Sender: linux-embedded-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Bill Gatliff Cc: Tom Cooksey , linux-embedded mailing list , Denis Olvier Kropp On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 07:50:08AM -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote: > Robert Schwebel wrote: > > In reality, there are no real alternatives for accelerates chips. > > Would the Silicon Motion SM50x chips qualify as an alternative? > > They can do the blitting, at least. No OpenGL, tho. So, I guess it > depends on your definition of "accelerated"... Yup, from our perspective it would be fine. Unfortunately, the hardware people in our project had (subjective, imho) concerns. rsc -- Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 Hannoversche Str. 2, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9