From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
To: rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Cc: jens.axboe@oracle.com, mingo@elte.hu, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH/RFC v2 3/6] stop_machine: use workqueues instead of kernel threads
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:50:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081013215131.623479134@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20081013215007.634620563@de.ibm.com
[-- Attachment #1: 003_stopmachine_wq.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5515 bytes --]
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Convert stop_machine to a workqueue based approach. Instead of using kernel
threads for stop_machine we now use a an rt workqueue to synchronize all
cpus.
This has the advantage that all needed per cpu threads are already created
when stop_machine gets called. And therefore a call to stop_machine won't
fail anymore. This is needed for s390 which needs a mechanism to synchronize
all cpus without allocating any memory.
As Rusty pointed out free_module() needs a non-failing stop_machine interface
as well.
As a side effect the stop_machine code gets simplified.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
---
kernel/stop_machine.c | 109 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/stop_machine.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/stop_machine.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/stop_machine.c
@@ -37,9 +37,13 @@ struct stop_machine_data {
/* Like num_online_cpus(), but hotplug cpu uses us, so we need this. */
static unsigned int num_threads;
static atomic_t thread_ack;
-static struct completion finished;
static DEFINE_MUTEX(lock);
+static struct workqueue_struct *stop_machine_wq;
+static struct stop_machine_data active, idle;
+static const cpumask_t *active_cpus;
+static void *stop_machine_work;
+
static void set_state(enum stopmachine_state newstate)
{
/* Reset ack counter. */
@@ -51,21 +55,25 @@ static void set_state(enum stopmachine_s
/* Last one to ack a state moves to the next state. */
static void ack_state(void)
{
- if (atomic_dec_and_test(&thread_ack)) {
- /* If we're the last one to ack the EXIT, we're finished. */
- if (state == STOPMACHINE_EXIT)
- complete(&finished);
- else
- set_state(state + 1);
- }
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&thread_ack))
+ set_state(state + 1);
}
-/* This is the actual thread which stops the CPU. It exits by itself rather
- * than waiting for kthread_stop(), because it's easier for hotplug CPU. */
-static int stop_cpu(struct stop_machine_data *smdata)
+/* This is the actual function which stops the CPU. It runs
+ * in the context of a dedicated stopmachine workqueue. */
+static void stop_cpu(struct work_struct *unused)
{
enum stopmachine_state curstate = STOPMACHINE_NONE;
+ struct stop_machine_data *smdata = &idle;
+ int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ if (!active_cpus) {
+ if (cpu == first_cpu(cpu_online_map))
+ smdata = &active;
+ } else {
+ if (cpu_isset(cpu, *active_cpus))
+ smdata = &active;
+ }
/* Simple state machine */
do {
/* Chill out and ensure we re-read stopmachine_state. */
@@ -90,7 +98,6 @@ static int stop_cpu(struct stop_machine_
} while (curstate != STOPMACHINE_EXIT);
local_irq_enable();
- do_exit(0);
}
/* Callback for CPUs which aren't supposed to do anything. */
@@ -101,78 +108,34 @@ static int chill(void *unused)
int __stop_machine(int (*fn)(void *), void *data, const cpumask_t *cpus)
{
- int i, err;
- struct stop_machine_data active, idle;
- struct task_struct **threads;
+ struct work_struct *sm_work;
+ int i;
+ /* Set up initial state. */
+ mutex_lock(&lock);
+ num_threads = num_online_cpus();
+ active_cpus = cpus;
active.fn = fn;
active.data = data;
active.fnret = 0;
idle.fn = chill;
idle.data = NULL;
- /* This could be too big for stack on large machines. */
- threads = kcalloc(NR_CPUS, sizeof(threads[0]), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!threads)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- /* Set up initial state. */
- mutex_lock(&lock);
- init_completion(&finished);
- num_threads = num_online_cpus();
set_state(STOPMACHINE_PREPARE);
- for_each_online_cpu(i) {
- struct stop_machine_data *smdata = &idle;
- struct sched_param param = { .sched_priority = MAX_RT_PRIO-1 };
-
- if (!cpus) {
- if (i == first_cpu(cpu_online_map))
- smdata = &active;
- } else {
- if (cpu_isset(i, *cpus))
- smdata = &active;
- }
-
- threads[i] = kthread_create((void *)stop_cpu, smdata, "kstop%u",
- i);
- if (IS_ERR(threads[i])) {
- err = PTR_ERR(threads[i]);
- threads[i] = NULL;
- goto kill_threads;
- }
-
- /* Place it onto correct cpu. */
- kthread_bind(threads[i], i);
-
- /* Make it highest prio. */
- if (sched_setscheduler_nocheck(threads[i], SCHED_FIFO, ¶m))
- BUG();
- }
-
- /* We've created all the threads. Wake them all: hold this CPU so one
+ /* Schedule the stop_cpu work on all cpus: hold this CPU so one
* doesn't hit this CPU until we're ready. */
get_cpu();
- for_each_online_cpu(i)
- wake_up_process(threads[i]);
-
+ for_each_online_cpu(i) {
+ sm_work = percpu_ptr(stop_machine_work, i);
+ INIT_WORK(sm_work, stop_cpu);
+ queue_work_on(i, stop_machine_wq, sm_work);
+ }
/* This will release the thread on our CPU. */
put_cpu();
- wait_for_completion(&finished);
+ flush_workqueue(stop_machine_wq);
mutex_unlock(&lock);
-
- kfree(threads);
-
return active.fnret;
-
-kill_threads:
- for_each_online_cpu(i)
- if (threads[i])
- kthread_stop(threads[i]);
- mutex_unlock(&lock);
-
- kfree(threads);
- return err;
}
int stop_machine(int (*fn)(void *), void *data, const cpumask_t *cpus)
@@ -187,3 +150,11 @@ int stop_machine(int (*fn)(void *), void
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stop_machine);
+
+static int __init stop_machine_init(void)
+{
+ stop_machine_wq = create_rt_workqueue("kstop");
+ stop_machine_work = alloc_percpu(struct work_struct);
+ return 0;
+}
+early_initcall(stop_machine_init);
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-13 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-13 21:50 [PATCH/RFC v2 0/6] Convert stop_machine to use a workqueue Heiko Carstens
2008-10-13 21:50 ` [PATCH/RFC v2 1/6] Call init_workqueues before pre smp initcalls Heiko Carstens
2008-10-13 21:50 ` [PATCH/RFC v2 2/6] workqueue: introduce create_rt_workqueue Heiko Carstens
2008-10-21 22:15 ` Rusty Russell
2008-10-13 21:50 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2008-10-13 21:50 ` [PATCH/RFC v2 4/6] stop_machine: special case for one cpu Heiko Carstens
2008-10-13 21:50 ` [PATCH/RFC v2 5/6] s390: convert etr/stp to stop_machine interface Heiko Carstens
2008-10-13 21:50 ` [PATCH/RFC v2 6/6] s390: convert to generic IPI infrstructure Heiko Carstens
2008-10-16 10:38 ` [PATCH/RFC v2 0/6] Convert stop_machine to use a workqueue Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081013215131.623479134@de.ibm.com \
--to=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.