From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Evgeniy Polyakov Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] HDQ Driver for OMAP2430/3430 Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:42:49 +0400 Message-ID: <20081014134249.GA5611@2ka.mipt.ru> References: <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB02D6107AF0@dbde02.ent.ti.com> <20081010133845.8b82fac3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <062801c92d37$3413bdd0$LocalHost@wipultra1303> <20081013085323.f8bd7efb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <015c01c92dda$1b754340$LocalHost@wipultra1303> <20081014055002.24ff586a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081014055002.24ff586a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: Madhusudhan Chikkature , gadiyar@ti.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Hi. On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 05:50:02AM -0700, Andrew Morton (akpm@linux-foundation.org) wrote: > I think it's reasonable to permit the driver's operations to be interrupted > in this manner. It's done in quite a few other places. But the problem is > actually *testing* it. Why not just skipping the waiting and returning error pretending user really sent a signal? -- Evgeniy Polyakov