From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755004AbYJPOX3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:23:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751856AbYJPOXU (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:23:20 -0400 Received: from moloch.purdy.org ([192.207.141.11]:4214 "EHLO moloch.hellmouth.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753341AbYJPOXU (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:23:20 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:17:52 +0100 From: Sean Purdy To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: david@fromorbit.com Subject: Re: BUG: XFS internal error xfs_trans_cancel in 2.6.27 Message-ID: <20081016151752.F30919@moloch.hellmouth.net> References: <20081009113610.F13062@moloch.hellmouth.net> <20081009230227.GL9597@disturbed> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20081009230227.GL9597@disturbed>; from david@fromorbit.com on Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:02:27AM +1100 X-Comments: Public PGP key available on request Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Dave Chinner said: > On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 11:36:10AM +0100, Sean Purdy wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Further to the discussion (and patching) of an xfs_trans_cancel > > issue in June, in kernel < 2.6.26 > > > > A similar issue came up on one disk of a 4 x 750GiB machine > > with a 2.6.24 kernel. So I installed 2.6.27-6 and gave it another try. > > But I'm still seeing the same problem. Remounting the drive each time > > is fine, and xfs_check shows no errors. > > 2.6.27-6? You mean 2.6.27-rc6? I meant rc9 as it happens, but never mind. > Anyway, you need to try this patch: > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00105.html > > which I posted a few days ago that fixes the latest reproducable > case of this shutdown that I know of. This patch worked fine, thanks very much! Can we get it into some stable version of 2.6.27? Maybe I can put in a bug request for the next Ubuntu kernel. Sean