From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1752031AbYJTDuR@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752031AbYJTDuR (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sun, 19 Oct 2008 23:50:17 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752085AbYJTDtt
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sun, 19 Oct 2008 23:49:49 -0400
Received: from phunq.net ([64.81.85.152]:40789 "EHLO moonbase.phunq.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751945AbYJTDts (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 19 Oct 2008 23:49:48 -0400
From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@phunq.net>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Kernel version numbering scheme change
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:49:46 -0700
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20081016002509.GA25868@kroah.com> <20081016142619.GA3756@tatooine.rebelbase.local> <20081016153512.GE12962@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20081016153512.GE12962@mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200810192049.46072.phillips@phunq.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thursday 16 October 2008 08:35, Theodore Tso wrote:
> Let's just leave things the way they are.

Or drop the useless fourth number and resume incrementing the minor
number if not the major.

Or just leave things the way they are, indeed.  I see Linus has
managed a prodigious silence on the troll, err, subject and with luck
it will stay that way.

Regards,

Daniel