From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: (lm90) Add support for the LM99 16
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:49:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081020144931.411e49fc@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
The LM99 differs from the LM86, LM89 and LM90 in that it reports
remote temperatures (temp2) 16 degrees lower than they really are. So
far we have been cheating and handled this in userspace but it really
should be handled by the driver directly.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
---
Documentation/hwmon/lm90 | 2 +-
drivers/hwmon/lm90.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.28-rc0.orig/Documentation/hwmon/lm90 2008-10-20 13:53:08.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.28-rc0/Documentation/hwmon/lm90 2008-10-20 14:18:15.000000000 +0200
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Supported chips:
Datasheet: Publicly available at the National Semiconductor website
http://www.national.com/pf/LM/LM90.html
* National Semiconductor LM89
- Prefix: 'lm99'
+ Prefix: 'lm89' (no auto-detection)
Addresses scanned: I2C 0x4c and 0x4d
Datasheet: Publicly available at the National Semiconductor website
http://www.national.com/mpf/LM/LM89.html
--- linux-2.6.28-rc0.orig/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c 2008-10-20 13:58:48.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.28-rc0/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c 2008-10-20 14:18:15.000000000 +0200
@@ -12,9 +12,9 @@
* made by National Semiconductor. Both have an increased remote
* temperature measurement accuracy (1 degree), and the LM99
* additionally shifts remote temperatures (measured and limits) by 16
- * degrees, which allows for higher temperatures measurement. The
- * driver doesn't handle it since it can be done easily in user-space.
+ * degrees, which allows for higher temperatures measurement.
* Note that there is no way to differentiate between both chips.
+ * When device is auto-detected, the driver will assume an LM99.
*
* This driver also supports the LM86, another sensor chip made by
* National Semiconductor. It is exactly similar to the LM90 except it
@@ -169,8 +169,8 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id lm90_i
{ "adt7461", adt7461 },
{ "lm90", lm90 },
{ "lm86", lm86 },
- { "lm89", lm99 },
- { "lm99", lm99 }, /* Missing temperature offset */
+ { "lm89", lm86 },
+ { "lm99", lm99 },
{ "max6646", max6646 },
{ "max6647", max6646 },
{ "max6649", max6646 },
@@ -366,6 +366,10 @@ static ssize_t show_temp8(struct device
else
temp = temp_from_s8(data->temp8[attr->index]);
+ /* +16 degrees offset for temp2 for the LM99 */
+ if (data->kind = lm99 && attr->index = 3)
+ temp += 16000;
+
return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", temp);
}
@@ -385,6 +389,10 @@ static ssize_t set_temp8(struct device *
long val = simple_strtol(buf, NULL, 10);
int nr = attr->index;
+ /* +16 degrees offset for temp2 for the LM99 */
+ if (data->kind = lm99 && attr->index = 3)
+ val -= 16000;
+
mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
if (data->kind = adt7461)
data->temp8[nr] = temp_to_u8_adt7461(data, val);
@@ -411,6 +419,10 @@ static ssize_t show_temp11(struct device
else
temp = temp_from_s16(data->temp11[attr->index]);
+ /* +16 degrees offset for temp2 for the LM99 */
+ if (data->kind = lm99 && attr->index <= 2)
+ temp += 16000;
+
return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", temp);
}
@@ -432,6 +444,10 @@ static ssize_t set_temp11(struct device
long val = simple_strtol(buf, NULL, 10);
int nr = attr->index;
+ /* +16 degrees offset for temp2 for the LM99 */
+ if (data->kind = lm99 && attr->index <= 2)
+ val -= 16000;
+
mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
if (data->kind = adt7461)
data->temp11[nr] = temp_to_u16_adt7461(data, val);
@@ -466,6 +482,10 @@ static ssize_t show_temphyst(struct devi
else
temp = temp_from_s8(data->temp8[attr->index]);
+ /* +16 degrees offset for temp2 for the LM99 */
+ if (data->kind = lm99 && attr->index = 3)
+ temp += 16000;
+
return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", temp - temp_from_s8(data->temp_hyst));
}
@@ -691,6 +711,15 @@ static int lm90_detect(struct i2c_client
} else
if ((chip_id & 0xF0) = 0x30) { /* LM89/LM99 */
kind = lm99;
+ dev_info(&adapter->dev,
+ "Assuming LM99 chip at "
+ "0x%02x\n", address);
+ dev_info(&adapter->dev,
+ "If it is an LM89, pass "
+ "force_lm86=%d,0x%02x when "
+ "loading the lm90 driver\n",
+ i2c_adapter_id(adapter),
+ address);
} else
if (address = 0x4C
&& (chip_id & 0xF0) = 0x10) { /* LM86 */
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
reply other threads:[~2008-10-20 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081020144931.411e49fc@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.