From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KsKPy-0001Vr-Uy
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:49:15 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KsKPx-0001VW-JS
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:49:14 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55844 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KsKPx-0001VS-Ce
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:49:13 -0400
Received: from relay01.mx.bawue.net ([193.7.176.67]:35743)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <ths@networkno.de>) id 1KsKPw-0007oO-8A
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:49:12 -0400
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:49:06 +0200
From: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] release date of qemu 0.9.2?
Message-ID: <20081021164906.GB29344@networkno.de>
References: <BAY110-DAV368495AFEC122115C5BA7B92E0@phx.gbl>
	<200810211610.44261.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<48FDF44A.2010302@codemonkey.ws>
	<200810211649.43058.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<48FE0214.9080901@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <48FE0214.9080901@codemonkey.ws>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Paul Brook wrote:
>> I think switching to a hard time driven release schedule would be a mistake.
>> In particular I think we should complete the TCG conversion before the 
>> next release.
>>   
>
> Yeah, I agree with you completely.
>
>> That said, 6 months between releases may be a reasonable starting point.
>
> Yes, I was thinking that to start with aiming for 6 month release  
> intervals is the right thing to do.

Agreed, 6 months sounds like it will catch enough worthwile features
for a new release.


Thiemo